Showing posts with label NASA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NASA. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
U.S. Government Shuts Down
By Justin Cates
In a fateful twist the United States Government is in the process of a partial shut-down on the 123rd anniversary of Yosemite National Park being designated as such.
Yeah you guessed it, the Park is closed now.
So is just about every government agency—NASA is furloughing 97% of their folks—unless they're designated essential. In that case, the people are coming to work...they just aren't getting paid.
America! Breathe it in friends. That's the smell of good old fashioned red, white and blue incompetence.
Now there are some who will point out that the last two government shut-downs have occurred under democratic administrations; President's Obama and Clinton. They will say this implies that the blame lies with those on the more liberal end of the American political spectrum.
Still, there are those who will say it's the fault of the largely Republican Congress' in both instances who are to blame for such a lack of leadership.
Both sides of this argument would be wrong.
It's a collective blame that must be shouldered in this and every case of ineffectual governance by these supposedly "exceptional" American citizens who claim so boldly to be running our government.
Bad governing, and thus, bad policy is bipartisan.
There's no way around the fact that all American politicians are incapable of affecting meaningful change without simultaneously asking, "What's in it for me?"
President Obama made a statement yesterday that cut to the heart of the matter regarding the ongoing "negotiations" in Congress.
"I shouldn't have to offer anything," he said.
"They're not doing me a favor by paying for things that they have already approved for the government to do. That's part of their basic function of government; that's not doing me a favor. That's doing what the American people sent them here to do, carrying out their responsibilities."
Now, why President Obama didn't say this years ago is far beyond me to guess. Perhaps he thought it was painfully obvious, but it clearly isn't.
I won't begin to delve into the nitty gritty of this political tomfoolery, largely because it's below me to stoop to the level of our elected officials.
I'm not a politician. I'm not cut out for the work as I possess both a spine and a moral compass that responds as it should to magnetic north.
Like most Americans, I believe that a representative government should work for the people. We don't always agree on what's best, but we agree the lights should always be on. It sets a bad precedent when government agencies don't show up to work.
It sends an even worse message when people deemed so vital to our nation's well-being that they must continue working during a government shut-down do just that, but aren't compensated for their efforts.
Sure, they'll most likely be paid later but that's part of the problem.
We've elected a government so focused on the now that they haven't the slightest concern for down the road. Our officials at present can't even agree on a short-term fix that won't actually fix anything. There's no agreeing to delaying our biggest problems.
We're bearing witness to a full-on power grab and the scum-sucking greedheads in Washington claiming to speak for the people don't actually give a damn about any of us.
They're focused on the future alright. Just not ours.
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Curiosity Killed the Cat...And Landed on Mars
NASA's successful Curiosity rover is a mind-blowing feat of technology that defied odds, but not logic or reason.
Careful planning by NASA scientists coupled with countless hours of design and testing here on Earth set the stage for one of mankind's truly remarkable achievements.
That being said, while the Internets [sic] have been super excited about humans building and landing what is essentially a nuclear-powered SUV 350,000,000 miles away, I worry that people as a whole are sufficiently jaded to the point where this isn't viewed as an impressive feat.
Certainly, sending a rover (no matter how incredible) isn't as sexy as landing humans, but these are crucial missions if we ever want to get to that point.
This isn't the sixties moon missions where we strapped young men to rockets and wished them the best of luck.
![]() |
An amazing composite photo taken by Curiosity. |
The stakes are higher because the challenge is significantly greater. Everything from communication issues to the mental health of the astronauts, even the difficulty of creating the spacecraft is magnified.
As for Curiosity, you've likely seen this video detailing the outrageous landing procedure by now but even so, you should watch it again.
On a side note, I'm totally down to volunteer for a one-way mission to Mars.
Sure that would mean dying on the red planet, but that's extraordinarily selfless to be the first person knowing fully you aren't coming back.
They'd put my face on money and have a federal holiday in my honor. Also, aside from the various rovers NO TRAFFIC.
Sold.
Labels:
Curiosity Rover,
Mars,
NASA
Monday, July 20, 2009
We Went To The Moon!
Today marks the 40th anniversary of Apollo 11 landing on the moon and Neil Armstrong setting foot on the lunar surface.
There are of course a few crack pots out there who believe it was all a hoax. There are even those who are convinced it was all filmed in Area 51, directed by Stanley Kubrick who was fresh off his classic film 2001: A Space Odyssey. Some have also claimed that famed science fiction writer and visionary Arthur C. Clarke wrote the script.
That's all nonsense as far as this reporter is concerned. For one thing NASA's LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) took pictures in 2009 showing several of the Apollo landing sites before it reached its mapping orbit. There are plenty of other compelling reasons to believe it happened, so I won't waste any more time in unnecessary debunking.
This anniversary marks one of the more impressive achievements in the history of man. The lunar lander had less computing power than my graphing calculator and actually, the Eagle almost never landed at all. Moments before they were supposed to touch down, Neil Armstrong noticed they were in a boulder field instead of the flat ground they were expecting.
He deftly steered the craft out of harm's way with just seconds of fuel to spare and saved the entire mission and quite possibly the lives of he and "Buzz" Aldrin.
It's just one of the many amazing things that had to go right for the guys that had "the right stuff" to become modern day American heroes.
So while NASA can certainly mess some things up on occasion nowadays, and there have been some pretty epic failures, the 1960s and early 1970s were a time when they were challenged everyday, and each time they rose to the task giving us something to be extremely proud of.
As President Kennedy said when proposing the idea:
I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space; and none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish.
Labels:
Apollo 11,
Arthur C. Clarke,
Buzz aldrin,
LRO,
NASA,
Neil Armstrong,
Stanley Kubrick
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Colbert Wins NASA Contest!

As Stephen Colbert would say, "WE DID IT!!!"
NASA's recent contest to name a new node for the International Space Station ended with the winning vote getter being "COLBERT".
Stephen instructed the nation to vote for his name to be sent into space and they responded with over 230,000 votes.
NASA reserves the right to choose an appropriate name for the node and they will make a final decision in April.
If they choose something other than "COLBERT", there will no doubt be hell to pay from his constituents.
Labels:
contest,
International Space Station,
NASA,
Stephen Colbert
Friday, March 6, 2009
Put Stephen Colbert In Space!

Nation, the other night on the Colbert Report, Stephen told his viewers to go to the NASA website and enter his name in the suggestion box for a contest to name a new node for the International Space Station.
Colbert is currently number one among the suggested names, though it in no way fits the criteria they've listed. Still, I think it's worth the effort to keep voting on Stephen's behalf until the contest ends on March 20th.
Below is the segment from the show explaining the importance and how he is in fact the new galactic overlord of Scientology.
Also, who would have ever imagined a blog post that would include this assortment of tags?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)